Anthropic’s reviews-and-social citation share was 7.5× OpenAI’s in location-grounded questions.
OpenAIAnthropic
What this measures
Anthropic’s reviews-and-social citation share was 7.5× OpenAI’s in location-grounded questions.
Comparison of shares within each model, not total citation volumes or the likelihood of a brand being recommended.
Where this number comes from
Read Finding 02 in the reportFindings 02–03, Figure 2With Location On, AI Cites the Sources That Know Places| OpenAI | 2.6% |
|---|---|
| Anthropic | 19.5% |
reviews and social take 19.5 percent of Anthropic’s against 2.6 for OpenAI
- Measurement period
- Q1 2026; fixed-cohort comparisons cover Q3 2025–Q1 2026
- Source verified
- · next review
Applies to
More from this report
- 80%80% of location-grounded AI citations pointed to brand websites or listings, sources brands can influence.
- 28%Citations per scan rose 28% quarter over quarter in a fixed 770-brand cohort.
- 2.77×The fixed 770-brand cohort’s total citations grew 2.77× over Q3 2025–Q1 2026.
- 5.8×MapQuest earned 5.8× as many citations as Wikipedia in location-grounded brand questions.